Newsgroups: alt.comics.batman
From: a130149@crazy (John Hall (0032 jvh ))
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 1994 10:15:20 GMT
Local: Tues, Mar 1 1994 11:15 pm
Subject: Re: Batman Art, was Jim Aparo
: |> >Just reacting to your attack on Jim Aparo -- it wasn't always thus.
: |> >His 70's work on Batman in Detective is adequate, and in mid-70's : |> >Brave and Bold work is rich and detailed, it a pity about his frozen : |> >faces, but these represent to me one of the classic faces of Batman. : |> >By no means the best, but classic. You want to see terrible Batman, : |> >I reckon Infantino is as bad as it gets, and you can spot it a mile off : |> >like Aparo's. : Well, I guess beauty really is in the eye of the beholder. I love Infantino's I'll agree to disagree on this. The sameness of Infantino's heads really distracts : My votes for lackluster Batman would be most of the current stable and Irv tenure. Do others agree that the Swamp Thing Issue Number 5 qualifies Wrightson Yes, I like Swamp Thing 7 very much. One of my favorite longer runs was the Colan Oh, the other totally forgetable Batman, IMO, is the stuff that occurred in World's My apologies for not getting on too well with VI. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||